I don’t know how to handle this Computer Science question and need guidance.
Leadership Paradox and Inter-team Relations
A. What is the leadership paradox? Give some reasons why a leader can encounter difficulty in newly formed teams or groups using a participative management system. Support your discussion with at least two (2) external sources.
B. Present a discussion of the strategies for encouraging participative management in the workforce, and how to implement each of these strategies. Support your discussion with at least two (2) external sources.
C. What serious biases or misassumptions do groups that are involved in inter-team conflict sometimes experience? How do these biases and prejudices affect the ability of teams to accomplish their goals? Support your discussion with at least two (2) external sources.
A. Directors are critical to their team and workers inside the organization. These top level supervisors are the more extensive piece of the hierarchical culture controlling the general endeavors. Over the timeframe these administrators shape the way of life of the organization and this generally requires some serious energy and can be moderate. Despite what might be expected, directors additionally make their very own sub-culture inside their organizations. Where in an association might be extremely commanding and controlling every one of its activities and representatives to adhere to a lot of standards and guidelines set down. Inside that culture a chief many carry on a piece diversely by being participative and approaching team individuals for settling on different choices which are enormously affected by workers in his sub culture and this is a paradox. (Silver, 2017)
B. Participative administration enables every one of the workers to add to strategies and arrangements to hit the objective of the organization while having work fulfillment. Participative administration negates the despotic administration style as the supervisor takes full oversight and settles on choices where as a participative director takes contribution from team individuals and thinks about all suppositions to discover answers to an issue inside the span of a venture. Subsequently, representatives feel esteemed and work more diligently for their chiefs and friends. (Baumgartner, 2011)
C. Intergroup strife happens when at least two offices inside an organization can’t help contradicting one another. Struggle emerges when one individual in the gathering demonstrations distinctively by inclination rejected from some other individual in the team. These sorts of contentions are likewise basic between religious gatherings, nations who can’t help contradicting one another. Intergroup clashes can emerge between different levels in an organization. Representatives in organizations structure bunches as a result of conditions, inclinations, culture or even in view of characters. Being focused can likewise cause sound or undesirable clashes between contradicting bunches in an organization.