Need help with my Powerpoint question – I’m studying for my class.
Important! Read First
This week you will complete the fourth Milestone that builds towards the completion of your Portfolio Project. Complete the Milestone that corresponds with the Portfolio Project option that you have selected (Option #1 ); it should be the same option number that you completed for previous Milestones. Indicate your selection in the title of your submission.
Option #1:
Planning for a PLN or PLE
Create an 8-10 slide presentation (in addition to the required introduction slide and a reference slide) that details a Personal Learning Network (PLN) or a Personal Learning Environment (PLE) that you might create for yourself. Identify social media platforms and tools that you would use, what groups or experts you would like as part of your LPN or PLE, and how you and your online presence would benefit from the PLN or PLE.
Your presentation must be professional in design and academic in writing. Support your recommendations with a minimum of two scholarly sources. Your course texts are a good place to start, and the CSU-Global Library (Links to an external site.) is another good place to find other sources. Your citations and references must be written and formatted according to the requirements in the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA (Links to an external site.).
You may use PowerPoint or an online slide presentation tool. Be sure to include for your instructor any necessary information for accessing your presentation. Follow the CSU-Global Visual Presentation Tips guidelines at http://csuglobal.libguides.com/CommonWritingAssign/vispresent (Links to an external site.).
Submit your presentation file to your instructor as an attachment. Review the rubric for this Milestone in the Module 7 Materials folder for specific grading criteria.
Rubric
COM340 Mod 7 PM
COM340 Mod 7 PM
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements
|
| 10.0 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
8.0 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
6.0 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
4.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSEO, PLN, or PLE: Application and Synthesis
|
| 10.0 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate application and synthesis of course concepts in the planning or proposing SEO, a PLE, or a PLN. Plan or proposal clearly communicates rationale and benefits to online presence.
|
8.0 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in application and synthesis.
|
6.0 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in application and synthesis.
|
4.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate application and synthesis.
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources / Examples
|
| 10.0 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
|
8.0 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less‐than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
|
6.0 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
|
4.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.
|
| 5.0 to >4.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.
|
4.0 to >3.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.
|
3.0 to >2.0 pts
Below Expectation
Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.
|
2.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style
|
| 5.0 to >4.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.
|
4.0 to >3.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.
|
3.0 to >2.0 pts
Below Expectation
Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.
|
2.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
Total Points: 40.0
|
Source link
